"Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path."  Psalm 119:105

  Contact Editor  | Bible studies  | Newer students  |  Bible Q & A's  |  Study tools  | Search our site
Library/Bookstore  |  Statement of faith  |  New material on site  | Join our mailing list  |  Home Page | Donate

QUESTION LIST; Page Number 37
| To list of all questions on Website |

 

1. The Lord's Supper

2. The 'teaching' that the Negro is the "Beast of the Field" of Genesis

3. Divorce when Civil Laws won't allow it

4. Most conspiracy sites are 30 percent accurate

5. Who writes the Bible studies at WBSG?

6. Perdition: The two beasts of Revelation 13 in relation to Revelation 20:10. And what of the "false prophet"?

7. Are Christians forbade to hate, and what of Eccl 3:8 "...a time to hate...."?  Also, the cause of the dilution of Christian resistance in these endtimes.

8. Spirit of Slumber—does God blind them anymore?  Also, could my unbelieving loved one convert at the last moment unbeknownst to me?

9. Deliberate Attack on USS Liberty

| To list of all questions on Website |

 
 

Question #1

| Back To Top |

The Lord's Supper

 

Answer:

"They said you have to partake of the Lord's Supper every week using Acts 20:7 as documentation.   I can't see any command from the Lord there."

1 Corinthians 11:18-34  [Christ's quoted words in red text]
18 For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it.
19 For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you.
20 When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's supper.
21 For in eating every one taketh before other his own supper: and one is hungry, and another is drunken.
22 What? have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or despise ye the church of God, and shame them that have not? What shall I say to you? shall I praise you in this? I praise you not.
23 For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread:
24 And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.
25 After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.
26 For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come.
27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.
31 For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged.
32 But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.
33 Wherefore, my brethren, when ye come together to eat, tarry one for another.
34 And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto condemnation. And the rest will I set in order when I come.  KJV

Back to list of questions at top of page

 
 

| Back To Top |

The False 'teaching' that the Negro is the "Beast of the Field" of Genesis

 

A reader writes:

Hey Nick, Xxxxxx here...  I have a question for you regarding the "beast of the field". I was reading on another identity site which states that the beast of the field is the negro, which is kind of funny in a way, since growing up in the deep south, I've come across many of these "beasts".  At first, I thought this was just a ridiculous theory, but the more I've looked into this, the more it seems to make sense.

In Genesis 1:25, God makes the beast of the earth.  Again, in Genesis 2:19, God forms the beast of the field.  So obviously, we're talking about 2 different types of beasts.  Exodus 19:13 speaks of the fact that not a hand shall touch it, whether it be beast or man.  Jonah 3:8 speaks of a beast that wears sack-cloth and cries mightily unto God.  I don't know of too many beasts (animals) that can cry mightily unto God.

There are other examples which I cannot think of at this time which also refer to this beast.  We know from science that the other races were created before the white race.  Therefore, I'm coming to the conclusion that these "beasts" may indeed be referring to the other races, but maybe not solely to blacks.  God made these beasts in Genesis 1:25, then created "man" (ruddy complected) in Gen 1:27, then formed "the man Adam" in Gen 2:7.  Again, two different events, one created and the other formed.

My only doubt about all of this is the fact that I had always assumed that the word "stranger" referred to the other races.  But I guess it could be possible that God refers to the other races as both beasts and strangers?  Just wanted to get your thoughts on this.  Thanks

Xxxxxxxxx

Answer:

Hello.  This is a false teaching.  And while it is very difficult and confusing to explain, I pray that I am able to do so clearly.  The teaching that you refer to states that the other races of mankind are the beasts of the field that were created before Adam.  And that only Adam's descendants are called men in the Bible.  Some, not you, then take this theory further to say that Negros and all other non-White races are not fully human, and do have souls.  This is a false and hurtful teaching. 

     Also, this perversion of the true Two Creation Events teaching is used by Judaics to defame those who teach it with their tactic: "guilt by association", lumping them (Two Creation Event teachers) in with Racists and Nazis.  The particular Judaics who do this are not of Adam, but are of Cain as our Lord stated in John 8:44 —thus it is in their best interest to dispel any "separate Races" truths.  The Judaics are the authors of the lie that says that all men are descended from Adam, and their "useful idiot" so-called Gentile Christian mega-preachers spread the lie for Judaic mammon funding.  They (Kenites fronting as Israelites) do this to hide their connection with their father Cain (who was of a sexual union of the serpent (satan) and Eve (see: What was the Real sin in the garden of Eden?)  Let it be noted that I do not state, nor believe, that all people who call themselves "Jews" are related to Cain.  Anyway, let us dispense of this "beast of the field" heresy presently:

Regarding your Scriptural reference, wherein you state:

"In Genesis 1:25, God makes the beast of the earth.  Again, in Genesis 2:19, God forms the beast of the field.  So obviously, we're talking about 2 different types of beasts."

     True, one is the (sacrificially) unclean ANIMALS, the second is (sacrificially) clean ANIMALS (don't confuse sacrificially clean with food clean as the food laws were not yet established at this point [remember that Able scarified an animal to God, so the sacrifice "laws" were in place early on, though little mentioned in early Scripture]).  For the difference in the Creation order and type, see: Mankind; two separate 'creation events' (halfway down in study to section, "The differences between the two creation events".

    How people can regard the below two Scriptures (which you referenced) as pertaining to black people, is beyond all rational comprehension.  Observe the language, and how that it specifies that these beasts are animal species.

Genesis 1:24-25
24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.  KJV

     In the next verse, God contrasts the above with man (human, both male and female):

Genesis 1:26-31
26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.  KJV

And your second Scripture:

Genesis 2:19-20
19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast [chay] of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast [chay] of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.  KJV

The word "beast" above in verse 20 is:

beast: Hebrew word #2416 chay (khah'-ee); from OT:2421; alive; hence, raw (flesh); fresh (plant, water, year), strong; also (as noun, especially in the feminine singular and masculine plural) life (or living thing), whether literally or figuratively:  KJV - age, alive, appetite, (wild) beast, company, congregation, life (-time), live (-ly), living (creature, thing), maintenance, merry, multitude, (be) old, quick, raw, running, springing, troop.

     Here is the gist of the "dilemma" and the answer as to why the "beasts of the field" cannot be Negros (or any other human beings):  There are two separate Hebrew words used in our Scriptures here for these animals.  One is behemah and the other is chay.

#929 behemah (be-hay-maw'); from an unused root (probably meaning to be mute); properly, a dumb beast; especially any large quadruped or animal (often collective): KJV - beast, cattle.

#2416 chay (khah'-ee); from OT:2421; alive; hence, raw (flesh); fresh (plant, water, year), strong; also (as noun, especially in the feminine singular and masculine plural) life (or living thing), whether literally or figuratively:  KJV - age, alive, appetite, (wild) beast, company, congregation, life (-time), live (-ly), living (creature, thing), maintenance, merry, multitude, (be) old, quick, raw, running, springing, troop.

    Now chay can also be any living thing (including a plant), but let's not confuse this right now.  Staying in context, we shall see that in our Scriptures, chay is referring to a living ANIMAL, not a plant or fish, etc.  (chay means simply: "living", and when applied to animals, it means living animal)   In Genesis 1:24-and again in 1:25 we see these two types of animals mentioned in relation to each other (i.e., they are different):

Genesis 1:24-25
24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living [chay] creature after his kind, cattle [behemah], and creeping thing, and beast of the earth [chay] after his kind: and it was so.
25 And God made the beast of the [chay] earth after his kind, and cattle [behemah] after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.  KJV

     Now to say that these [chay] (beasts) are Negros, is to say that God called for cannibalism; for, in Gen 9:2 & 3 we see that God told Noah that he was eat those [chay] as food!

Genesis 9:1-4
9:1 And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.
2 And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of [chay] the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered.
3 Every moving thing that liveth [chay] shall be meat for you; even as [just as] the green herb have I given you all things.
4 But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat.  KJV

     Obviously something is wrong with the "beasts being Negros theory"!  Here is the difference between chay and behemah:  it is not White men and Black men, but rather it is two different classes of animal families.  One is clean to eat, and one is clean to sacrifice unto God.  Yes, there is a difference; while all clean to sacrifice animals were clean to eat, not all clean animals to eat can be offered to God in sacrifice (back when the sacrifice "laws" were still in effect; though they are no longer in effect since Christ's passion).  For example, one may eat a clean fish (one having both fins and scales), but never is a fish sacrificed to God in any Scripture of the Bible, even though certain fish were clean to eat.  That is the simple difference between chay and behemah, when animals is the subject.

     The reason for the confusion when reading the early (pre-flood) Scriptures lies (wherein lies the error of the "Negros are the beasts of the field" dogma) in the fact that God had not yet set up the sacrificial system.  Though Able did sacrifice an animal to God, God had not yet explained this to us in the Bible.  Below God explains it to us in the Bible (but it was provided for and planned from the early creation in Genesis chapter one, as we just observed in Gen 1:24-25 where the two classes of animals were created (PRIOR to Adam in the Garden, I might add).  The below is especially useful in explaining the difference between chay and behemah as both are mentioned, in different administrations, to Noah:

Animals clean to sacrifice to God (behemah):

Genesis 8:20-21
20 And Noah builded an altar unto the LORD; and took of every clean beast [behemah], and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar.
21 And the LORD smelled a sweet savour [i.e., He was pleased with the sacrifice]; and the LORD said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done.  KJV

Animals clean to eat as food  (chay):

Genesis 9:1-4
9:1 And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.
2 And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of [chay] the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered.
3 Every moving thing that liveth [chay] shall be meat for you; even as [just as] the green herb have I given you all things.
4 But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat.  KJV

     So, to recap, we have both chay and behemah in two Scriptures, first in Gen 1 regarding the creation, and secondly in Gen 8 & 9 regarding clean to eat, and clean to sacrifice, animals.  Incidentally, the animal that Able sacrificed to God was of the sheep that he raised (a sheep is a behemah), as we would expect if I am correct here, and if God indeed did provide early on for the sacrificial animal system early on:

Both cattle and sheep are behemah animals (clean to sacrifice and eat):

Joel 1:18
18 How do the beasts [behemah] groan! the herds of cattle are perplexed, because they have no pasture; yea, the flocks of sheep are made desolate.  KJV

Regarding your second Scriptural reference, wherein you state:

"Exodus 19:13 speaks of the fact that not a hand shall touch it, whether it be beast or man."

     Beast means just that—an animal.  Do you suppose that these "beasts" cannot be animals because God threatened to punish them?  God often punished animals.  For instance, "And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast." (Leviticus 20:15-16).  This cannot mean "non-Whites, or Non-Adamites, or non-Israelites; for, Israelite males were permitted to take non-Israelite female virgin (much could be said on this as well, but for time [see Num 31:17-18]) wives of the captives of battle. (only males can marry outside their Tribe/race—the women must remain within the tribe—else she is cast out of the tribe and she becomes of the foreign tribe [Why?  Because the seed passes through the male sperm—the woman's egg is a blank slate in that regard—much could be said on this but for time]).

Deuteronomy 21:10-13
10 When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the LORD thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive,
11 And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife;
12 Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails;
13 And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife.  KJV

     Had beasts of the field been non-Whites or non-Israelites, then the above Scripture is contradictory (which it is not possible for a Scripture to contradict another one). 

      Notice in the Scripture below, which you reference, that the humans are all referred to " 'am " (people).  The Hebrew word " 'am " in the base word in the Hebrew phrase "Lo-Ammi" (i.e., not my people—Hosea 1:9), thus 'am is people, not animals ("lo" means "not").

Exodus 19:11-15
11 And be ready against the third day: for the third day the LORD will come down in the sight of all the people upon mount Sinai.
12 And thou shalt set bounds unto the people round about, saying, Take heed to yourselves, that ye go not up into the mount, or touch the border of it: whosoever toucheth the mount shall be surely put to death:
13 There shall not an hand touch it, but he shall surely be stoned, or shot through; whether it be beast or man, it shall not live: when the trumpet soundeth long, they shall come up to the mount.
14 And Moses went down from the mount unto the people, and sanctified the people; and they washed their clothes.
15 And he said unto the people, Be ready against the third day: come not at your wives.

hand: [I point out "hand" here, because some may say that "animals" don't have hands, therefore, they say, this means different races of humans.  But as we se, it does not necessarily mean the human hand]: hand: Hebrew word #3027 yad (yawd); a primitive word; a hand (the open one [indicating power, means, direction, etc.], in distinction from OT:3709, the closed one); used (as noun, adverb, etc.) in a great variety of applications, both literally and figuratively, both proximate and remote [as follows]: KJV - (+be) able, about, armholes, at, axletree, because of, beside, border, bounty, broad, [broken-] handed, by, charge, coast, consecrate, creditor, custody, debt, dominion, enough, fellowship, force, from, hand [-staves, -y work], he, himself, in, labour, large, ledge, [left-] handed, means, mine, ministry, near, of, order, ordinance, our, parts, pain, power, presumptuously, service, side, sore, state, stay, draw with strength, stroke, swear, terror, thee, by them, themselves, thine own, thou, through, throwing, thumb, times, to, under, us, wait on, [way-] side, where, wide, with (him, me, you), work, yield, yourselves.

beast: hebrew word #929  behemah (be-hay-maw'); from an unused root (probably meaning to be mute); properly, a dumb beast; especially any large quadruped or animal (often collective):  KJV - beast, cattle.

man: Hebrew word #376 'iysh (eesh); contracted for OT:582 [or perhaps rather from an unused root meaning to be extant]; a man as an individual or a male person; often used as an adjunct to a more definite term (and in such cases frequently not expressed in translation): KJV - also, another, any (man), a certain, champion, consent, each, every (one), fellow, [foot-, husband-] man, [good-, great, mighty) man, he, high (degree), him (that is), husband, man [-kind], none, one, people, person, steward, what (man) soever, whoso (-ever), worthy. Compare OT:802.

people: Hebrew word #5971 `am (am); from OT:6004; a people (as a congregated unit); specifically, a tribe (as those of Israel); hence (collectively) troops or attendants; figuratively, a flock:  KJV - folk, men, nation, people.

Your closing comment was:

"My only doubt about all of this is the fact that I had always assumed that the word "stranger" referred to the other races."

You are correct, the stranger is other races other than Israel.

In conclusion: 

• In Gen 1:24 God introduces clean to eat animals, "chay";

• In Gen 1:24 God introduces animals that are to go on to be both clean to eat AND sacrifice, "behemah";

• In Gen 1:26-27 God introduces all the different races of mankind (who later are referred to as "Gentiles"*);

• In Gen 2:7 God introduces Adam's tribe (and perhaps the White race*).

*Not enough info is available in Scripture to determine if a Caucasian-type of peoples were created on the sixth day. However there are in later Scriptures a Caucasian (White) type of peoples who were referred to as "Gentiles."   BUT, the term "Gentiles" did not come about until until AFTER Israel was established: therefore, "Gentiles" does not necessarily mean "people other than Whites," nor does it necessarily mean "people other than of Adam's tribe;" but rather it means "people other than Israel."  And we know that there were many White people of Adam's heritage that where born to other White people before Jacob/Israel was even born.  These people also had descendants who are with us today.  And while all Israelites are White people, not all White people are Israelites.   Many proponents of teaching of "Anglo-Israelism," "Seedliners," "British-Israelism," "Lost Ten Tribes," "Dispersed Israel," or whatever they are called today, fail to realize this stark fact!  There are many White peoples (descendants of Adam), that WERE NOT OF ISRAEL'S HERITAGE, because their ancestors came before, and not through, Jacob/Israel.  Therefore, "Gentiles" does not mean ONLY non-Whites, any more than "beasts of the field" mean Black people or non-Whites.

The early peoples referred to as "Israel" are only the descendants of Jacob/Israel; so, ironically, Abraham (Jacob's grandfather), and Isaac (Jacob's father) were not Israelites!  And had not God changed Jacob's name to "Israel," Jacob himself would not have been an Israelite!  Now you know the reason and the wisdom behind why God changed Jacob's name to Israel.  Had He not, then Jacob, the great patriarch of the peoples Israel, would not have been covered under:

Isaiah 45:17
17 But Israel shall be saved in the LORD with an everlasting salvation: ye shall not be ashamed nor confounded world without end.  KJV

Romans 11:26
26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:  KJV

  Peace.

________________________________________________________________________
God bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ's name!
Nick Goggin

 

Back to list of questions at top of page

 
 

| Back To Top |

 

Divorce when Civil Laws won't allow it

 

A reader writes:

Hello Nick,

I married a woman of another country [less than one year] months ago, We knew each other 3 years previous before our marriage we both went through divorces prior to our meeting, and our marriage. Three weeks ago her parents did some internet research on a certain pastor, we most people who visit your great site, know.  Not to say we didn't have problems before, but this was the icing on the cake,  she wanted me out and claimed that I was in a cult ( for believing what really happened in the garden [*see below]).

[WBSG Note: This is the danger and sin for all of those so-called Christians who repeat lies and slander about Pastor Murray of the Shepherds Chapel.  Many of you have no idea of all the sins that you shall answer for on Judgement Day when you slander and lie about a Christian Minister.  Take for example this man's divorce: it is a sin on the heads of the false accusers—you know who you are!  When you denounce a Christian Clergyman, you had better be right!  Which is why I included audio excerpts when I refuted the fallen Pastor Lance knight.  If I were to be wrong about him, I would be judged upon all the damage that that err caused.  This is a very serious issue that Internet play-Christians take mildly (I refer to the slander and lies against Christian Pastors, in this case, particularly against one Pastor Arnold Murray).]

It pained my heart to leave her and my son, but I would not believe a lie (the Christianity we see on TV she wanted me to take on tongues and all) in exchange for the truth. I know it is my fault for not telling her the truth in the garden and all the truths we know, but somewhere in my heart I thought it would all work out.

Now I have moved back into the states, but I was married in Canada. Unfortunately because of their laws the divorce we are getting will take between 2 to 3 years based on her last divorce which had no complications even though she had a son previously. Canada requires one year separation before paperwork can proceed for the divorce.

Now with all that background my question is, is she and I to remain faithful till the divorce papers go through? Or can we in time see other people. Are we sinning? I feel I should know this but I am so heartbroken at the moment. I found out she is already seeing someone and its only been a few weeks, am I to remain faithful till the letter be signed for the divorce, ,or may I seek another's (one that believes the same) in time myself? I apologize if you do not answer these personal questions, I am just at a loss at what to do right now. I would very much appreciate your guidance, as I see in other questions your knowledge in the word is outstanding. I would very much like your reply.

Xxxxxx from Xxxxxxx

[*WBSG notes from above:  the reader refers to teachings similar to as found in our: What was the Real sin in the garden of Eden? .  Many endtime Christians are totally ignorant as to what happened in the Garden of Eden, and believing the false teachings of their particular denomination 'traditions of men," and driven by misplaced modesty, they reject the clear Scriptural truths as 'remarkable.'  Many of them get downright mad—as I know from the hate mail that I receive (mostly of late—"coincidentally" since I challenged fallen-Pastor Lance Knight and his possessed follower's false doctrines [see: The Overnight fall of Pastor Lance Knight and his Flock (with audio excerpts of Lance's heretical 'teachings') ])from some "Christians" (the so-called self-righteous "Christians") regarding satan's beguiling of Eve in the Garden of Eden.]

Answer:

Hello Xxxxxx:

     What I am about to say is sure to send the pew-potatoes and misguided self-righteous among the flock into a tizzy.  Nevertheless, you asked a Scriptural question, you are deeply troubled, and you shall have a Scriptural answer—regardless of what the holier-than-thou crowd "feels comfortable" with.

     If I tell not the truth, God shall be my judge.  I shall endeavor to heavily lace this response to your question with Scripture, so that I may be simply a guide to the Scriptures—allowing the Scriptures to speak.  For, it is not my opinion that you seek, nor should you; but, rather, you seek to know where you stand in regards to our Heavenly Father's written Word—the ultimate guide in writing to how to please Him. 

     Now to the holier-than-thou's, whom I know so well:  I know that right now you want to write me a mean-spirited letter stating that I have just spoken in error, and that Jesus, not the Bible, is "the ultimate guide...to how to please Him".

     Careless reading ( a plague of them all) causes many of them to jump the gun, and to find heresy where there is no heresy.  A careful reading of what I said in the above paragraph would reveal that I said "IN WRITING."  Yes, Jesus is the ultimate guide to how man is to serve and please the Father (I would insert a "Duh!" here, but one of 'em wrote me and said that I sound like a ten year old kid when I do that).  However, you cannot separate Jesus from the written Word, for, He came in the volume of the book—it was about Him:

Hebrews 10:4-10
4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
5 Wherefore when he [Jesus Christ] cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me:
6 In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin thou hast had no pleasure.
7 Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God.
8 Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and offering for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein; which are offered by the law;
9 Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first [Covenant], that he may establish the second [Covenant].
10 By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.  KJV  [Quoted from Psm 40:7, indicating that this Jesus Christ was the fulfillment of the Messiah promised of God.  Jews of all stripes [both the Secular (Atheist) Jews, and the so-called "religious" ["Observant"] Jews deny Christ Jesus.  And those few "religious Jews" who follow the old Covenant [Old Testament (but it is really the Babylonian Talmud, not the Hebrew Old Testament that they follow)] do not know they are blaspheming God—for, God ordained the second Covenant and disannulled the first Covenant: "In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away." (Heb 8:13).]

     I shall not interrupt herein any longer with taking away "debating points" from the enemies of God and Christ dressed in sheep's clothing.  But, I just felt the need to stop them in their tracks, and to alert them to read slowly, and think on it slower—instead of skimming the text and rushing off to jump to conclusions.

     Also, the reason that I take the time to address these hypocrites and the ignorant to God and His written Word, is because they will carelessly and ignorantly keep you in bondage because of their own misunderstanding of the Scriptures and the power of Christ's work on the cross, and of His words and written Word (Bible). 

     Anyway, Xxxxxx; you have a problem, I see.  (Great place for one of those "ten year old's" Duh's!  :o)

    May I be clinical, and painfully honest here with you, Xxxxx?  I suspect that that is exactly what you are seeking from me.

Your first error: You said:

"...Not to say we didn't have problems before, but this was the icing on the cake,  she wanted me out and claimed that I was in a cult. . . . I know it is my fault for not telling her the truth in the garden and all the truths we know, but somewhere in my heart I thought it would all work out. "

     You erred in that you did not take your rightful place as leader of the family, and you did not assert your God-given authority as spiritual head of the house-hold:

Ephesians 5:21-25
21 Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.
22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church : and he is the saviour of the body.
24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.
25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;  KJV

     You did not "love her" in that you allowed her, to avoid argument, to believe lies regarding the Scriptures and our Lord.  She did not "submit" to you, in that she usurped your authority in the home, casting you out, and placed her parents over you.  When her father gave her away to you at the wedding, that was much more than symbolic—he gave you charge over her.  (I know that this is unpopular with the Feminists, but that is the basis for the ritual in the Wedding Ceremony where the father walks the bride down the aisl and hands her to the soon-to-be husband.)  She disobediently went behind your back and was not faithful to her vows of "obey."  (By Feminist agenda, the term "obey" is/has been systematically removed from modern-day Wedding Vows.)  Her parents erred in that they intruded where it was no longer their place to intrude; and actually facilitated your divorce.  Yes, you are divorced.  But there is more, read on please; there are loose ends that you need tie up.

     Now I know that today's Feminist minded Christian women (90⁺% of all Christian professing women) will object to my stating that God said for a wife to be obedient to her husband.  So what?  They are upset, aren't Feminists and Lesbians and New-Agers  always "upset" with the Scriptures?  It is not my words here that they are upset with, they are upset with God's Word; they just take it out on me:

1 Timothy 2:11-12
11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.  KJV

Colossians 3:18
18 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord.  KJV

1 Corinthians 14:33-35
33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.
34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. [in Gen 3:16]
35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.  KJV

Titus 2:3-5
3 The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things;
4 That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,
5 To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.  KJV

    Taking just the last Scripture above, we can see how satan's influence in this world had taught women that they, by some right, have the authority to usurp their husbands.  This explains the over 55% divorce rate and the over 33% wife infidelity rates (self admitted) that we are currently experiencing in the Christian Western Nations.  Most women today, including the greater majority of so-called Christian women today are not following the Bible, but rather are following the human manifesto; and they are not following God, but rather are following satan-because "it feels good," and they "love to have it so":

Jeremiah 5:29-31
29 Shall I not visit for these things? saith the LORD: shall not my soul be avenged on such a nation as this?
30 A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land;
31 The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?  KJV

     The fall of every great civilization followed immediately on the heels of the moral fall of their women.  How close we are indeed to that abandon.  Anyway, enough about that—they won't listen anyways—they have tasted from the forbidden tree of "freedom" and excess, they will never come back.

Your second error; you said:

"It pained my heart to leave her and my son, but I would not believe a lie (the Christianity we see on TV she wanted me to take on tongues and all [Yikes!  See our: 'Unknown' Tongues study]) in exchange for the truth. I know it is my fault for not telling her the truth in the garden and all the truths we know, but somewhere in my heart I thought it would all work out.

     You error in that you say that you left them.  You did not leave anyone; the civil laws of the nation forced you to leave.  You did not abandon, but rather, you were abandoned.  Had you tried to reenter the house, she could have had you arrested.  (Satan gave them [women] civil power over their men, whom God had given [men] leadership power over [their women].)  This really is all part of satan's plan.  Many people have yet to make the connection between Feminism and the breakdown of the modern family.  Why not?  Because they haven't looked into it—they just believed the subterfuge of the Judaic-controlled media and social agendas.  A good place to start would be the following Website (Note;  We do not agree with all of their Theology, and the Author there is a "converted" Jew, which always makes me suspicious, for good reason; but he does expose the apparatus [Note 2:  I do not accuse Dr. Makow, I just keep both eyes open when dealing with "converted Judaics"; for, as history has confessed, many of those "conversions" where insincere, and where just a platform for destroying Christianity from within]): savethemales.ca - exposing feminism and the new world order.  Am I so-called "AntiSemitic"?  No, don't be silly, please.

     Moving on; you said:

"...I found out she is already seeing someone and its only been a few weeks, am I to remain faithful till the letter be signed for the divorce,...."

     Once again, I must be painfully and clinically clear.  And sorry if this hurts you, but:  being that your wife has already been married twice, and has a child, is probably in her mid thirties to early forties, and is "seeing" someone weeks after kicking you out:  it is inconceivable that she isn't engaging in sexual relations with other men/man (it also makes one wonder how she found a new boyfriend so soon after casting you aside, if you know what I am driving at [you did mention that you were having problems before this latest issue]).  Now I agree that I am making an assumption here, but I feel that the circumstances, and the ways of this present world, would prove me to not be jumping to vain conclusions.  Why is this important?  It is important because, IF, and I will give her the benefit of the doubt, reluctantly; but, IF she is having sex with other men or another man, then she is an Adulteress.  And every man that has her is an Adulterer.  This is significant to your present dilemma.

     God hates divorce, that much He has told us.  But He allows it for the hardness of our hearts:

Malachi 2:16
16 For the LORD, the God of Israel, saith that he hateth putting away [divorce]: for one covereth violence with his garment, saith the LORD of hosts: therefore take heed to your spirit, that ye deal not treacherously.  KJV

Matthew 19:7-8 [Christ speaking]
7 They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?
8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.  KJV

     However, Christ continues on in the next verse of Matt 18 to reveal a very important fact to your situation: that even with God, there were certain circumstances that divorce was acceptable.  One of them being Adultery:

Matthew 19:9 [Christ speaking]
9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away [divorce] his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.  KJV

     In other words, it was always okay to put away a wife for Adultery.  Even BEFORE Moses gave them divorce for their weakness (hardness of heart).  Did not go put away Israel for Adultery (Idolatry)?  Now, in the old days this was not too much of a problem, because the Adulteress and her Adulterer "lover" were judged the next day by the witnesses and elders of the city, and abruptly stoned to death.  End of Adulteress and Adulterer.  Back then, Adultery was not as prevalent as they are today in satan's world.  But no, we are not to kill them anymore (Adulteresses & Adulterers, nor Homosexuals, Blasphemers, Beasialiters, and every other death-penalty case in the Bible, etc.)—let God do that on Judgement Day.  We are now bound to follow the laws of the land as per (Rom 13:1-7), and if we were to kill one of these people, even though called for by the Law of God (which Jesus did not annul - Matt 5:17-18), it would be considered murder in a court of law.  I don't know about you, but I don't want to have my heart broken by a whorish woman—and then spend the next twenty years fighting off the Sodomites (Homosexuals) in prison.  :o)

Romans 13:1-7
13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers [government]. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
3 For [civil] rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
5 Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. [law-breaking Christian make a poor example of Christ]
6 For for this cause pay ye tribute [taxes] also: for they are God's ministers [taxes supoport military and police 7 fire protection, and social programs supposedly for the poor and needy, widows and orphans [but satan's Judaics have the lazy and the "entitlement crowd" in line also—let God sort them out], attending continually upon this very thing.
7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.  KJV

Matthew 5:17-18
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.  KJV

     Many men are in prison for murdering unfaithful wives; who, in the Old Testament days would not have even had to see a day in court.  So much for the new age.  But don't forget that, now, through Jesus Christ, these wanton sinful women and men may repent and be washed clean.  Much has changed since the Old Testament, in the administration of God's Law; but the Law was never changed.  Only that mercy has entered-in with Jesus Christ [evident when he Pardoned the Adulteress in the Gospel].  So don't anybody go out and do something stupid (killing).  Let God judge.

     So, much hinges on whether your wife has committed this adultery.  Either you two are just having a fight, or she has broken the marriage contract by Adultery.  How can you find out?  Probably just ask her on the telephone—most women today do not even know to be ashamed of it—they have been so deluded by satan and his minions on Earth, that they really think that if they simply leave their man they are free to lay down with others.  Fools!

     Why Am I so hard on women?  It is not because I do not like them, but rather it is because I worry for them.  I see how they have been deceived like the boldest of Eve's.  I too am divorced, a fact that play-Christians would enjoy to mock on the multitude of Judaic-infiltrated so-called Christian Internet Talk Forums.  But I never put any wife away, I was put away by my wife; as I see, you were.  But who does modern day women a greater service; one who pats her on the back for every notch on her bed; or, one like myself who shows her Scripture wherein God teachers her how she ought to be a faithful and decent daughter of God?

     You judge.  But surprising as it may seem, I am not very popular with Feminists, Lesbians, and whorish women.  :o)

     But this is no laughing matter, and I inserted the smiley face to lighten things up a bit; however, through satan and his servants on this Earth (Judaics) women today are in great peril of the Judgement.  Look at Abortion rates; by age 45, most Western women will have had at least one Abortion (and most women who have had an Abortion, have multiple Abortions).  An average of 33% of Western women admit to committing Adultery on their husbands.  Females are having random sex at 13 & 14 years of age, and it is a rare find to find a female virgin by age 18, much less age 21 or 24.  What these poor manipulated women do not know is that, in God's eyes, so very many of them are Murderesses and Adulterers and Harlots.  Below is something that satan and his Judaic agentures don't want you know, ladies:

Matthew 19:16-18
16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?
17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
18 He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,  KJV

     Is a fetus a person?  Yep!  Sorry, Honey, but the Abortion Doctor, your Schools and Universities, the Judaic-controlled Media and Social Engineers, many churches, and the Feminist crowd lied to you.  God says in the below that if someone intentionally kills a fetus that they are to likewise be killed themselves.  In other words, life begins AT CONCEPTION:

Exodus 21:22-23
22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
23 And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,  KJV

Watch the numbers of Abortions Increase For the "Christian" Western nations

Abortion Counter from www.1way2God.net

NOTE: If a Christian woman has had an abortion, then repent to God in Jesus Christ's name, and be freed of the sin; then go on and live your life.  Through Christ you will be forgiven when you repent.  Only a Christian can repent in Jesus' name.  All other women who've had abortions, who are not Christians—you shall answer for it on Judgement Day without the benefit of the Great Intercessor, Jesus Christ.  But you are in much great trouble then anyway for rejecting the only way to life eternal—Jesus Christ.

Am I trying to down or scare people here?  Am I setting myself up as  a judge here?  NO!  I too am a sinner saved by grace, and many of the things on this page I myself am guilty of.  But women MUST be told the truth, NO MATTER HOW MUCH IT HURTS—or else how will they know to covert and repent?  Allowing women to believe that with their Abortion they have only extracted soulless tissue and blood, and that they haven't killed a human being—is to let then go ignorantly to Judgement Day with the sin on their souls.  When, had they known, they could have repented in Jesus Christ's name and been forgiven.  Likewise, Heathen women (ALL non-Christians) can convert to Christianity, repent to God Almighty in Jesus' name, and be made clean—and not perish in the fires.  When you Politically Correct cowards don't stand on the truth of the Scriptures, you help no one but your own sorry self—and you do lead many to "hell."  This too, YOU shall answer for.

NOTE 2:  Special consideration is made in countries where being a Christian is a executable offence.  In that case the Christian is not bound to proselytize.  Documentation:  "Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison." [Mat5:25].)  The self-righteous free-country Christians (USA, England, etc.) will object to what I just said; but, every Christian in a nation that persecutes Christians (China, Muslim countries, the whole world during the Tribulation, etc.), shall understand completely what I have just said, and what the Scripture has just backed me up on.  You can't deny Jesus Christ, but in these above mentioned cases you are released from the Great Commission of preaching to them:  "And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature." (Mk 16:15).  Let God handle those nations, and if He desires to convert in them, let Him send men well armed (or specially protected) to proselytize there (convert to Christianity). 

This very day, Moslems and Atheists will kill you for simply being a Christian; and in the Tribulation the Jews shall kill you for it.  Therefore, as our Lord said, before you open your mouth: "Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves." (Mat 10:16).  And it isn't very wise to stand up on a car and preach Jesus Christ in China or in Militant Muslim countries.  besides, you won't be able to reach very many people there with the Good News of the Gospel of Christ when you are trying to put your head back on.  Satan isn't playing.  Be wise! 

"But...but...President Bush and my Church Leaders told me that Islam is a religion of peace," some may say.  Well, they lied to you!  Read the Koran for a few minutes.  Look at the Humanist manifesto in China for a couple of seconds.  Read the book of Revelation for a chapter or two (try Rev 13:14-15 for starters) and see what Muslims, Chinese, and Jews have in store for you, respectively.

Be wise, please, the world needs more Christians.  When God wants you to speak under those distressed conditions—He will tell you.  Until then, live, Christian, live.

Deuteronomy 23:17
17 There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel.  KJV

Deuteronomy 22:20-21
20 But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel:
21 Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.  KJV

Leviticus 20:10
10 And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.  KJV

Leviticus 20:13
13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.  KJV

And yes, women; the laws against Homosexuality also apply to Lesbianism.  It was just that back then such an abomination wasn't even thought of (though it is covered under the "fornication" laws).  But satan has made Lesbianism easy today:

Romans 1:26-27
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.  KJV

     Blessed are the Christian women among them who find repentance unto salvation through Jesus Christ.  They rest of them (unsaved unbelievers) shall litter "hell."  And despite popular misconception, Christian women are just as likely (numerically) to have abortions and commit wanton pre-marital sex.  The divorce rate are little better for Christian women, and their Adultery rate is lower.  That is for REAL Christian women, not the play-Christians that we see so much of today.

     So women, just repent and stop doing it.  It really is that easy, you know.  Don't let the prince of this world (satan) separate you eternally for the King of kings and Lord of lords (Jesus Christ).  A simple read of the Bible will show that women have a greater responsibility, and are held to a higher level of accountably, regarding matters sexual.  Doesn't seem fair to you?  Deal with it, take it up with God when you are pleading for your soul in Revelation .

Revelation 20:11-15
11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.
12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.  KJV

     And you men, when you cause our women to do the above things, and I know that you do; then you shall stand right beside her on Judgement Day answering for that sin.  You shall be Judged two for the crime.  You want to pay for an Abortion—then you own that Abortion; you want to charm a virgin out of her pants—then you own that whoredom; you want to seduce a married woman—then you own that Adultery; you want to coerce your wife into "threesomes" and other sexually immoral trysts—then you own that Adultery and Lesbianism, not only your own, but some of hers as well.  Men have a greater responsibility, and are held to higher degree of accountability in matters of leadership over a woman & family, and in leading a woman astray, sexually or otherwise.  For, God had said to the woman:

Genesis 3:16
16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.  KJV

And again, He has told her to obey her husband:

1 Timothy 2:11-12
11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.  KJV

Colossians 3:18
18 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord.  KJV

1 Corinthians 14:33-35
33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.
34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.  KJV

Titus 2:3-5
3 The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things;
4 That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,
5 To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.  KJV

1 Peter 3:1-6
3:1 Likewise, ye wives , be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives;
2 While they behold your chaste conversation coupled with fear.
3 Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel;
4 But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price.
5 For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands:
6 Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement.  KJV

Verse 6 above refers to Sarah calling Abraham Adoni (and for those who understand the majesty of that Hebrew title, you will glean much from this Scripture):

Genesis 18:12
12 Therefore Sarah laughed within herself, saying, After I am waxed old shall I have pleasure, my lord being old also?  KJV

Lord: Hebrew word #113 'adown (aw-done'); or (shortened) 'adon (aw-done'); from an unused root (meaning to rule); sovereign, i.e. controller (human or divine):  KJV - lord, master, owner. Compare also names beginning with "Adoni-".

     Therefore, O man, you carry some of her guilt with her when you lead her to sin against God.  So you see, ladies, God really is fair; you just have to understand His rules.  God shall not hold the seducing man guiltless on Judgement Day.

     To those women, Neo-Feminists mostly, who do not approve of being told to "obey" a man: Why do you rebel?  Do not we all fall under the obedience of the Lord, both men and women?  And are not we all under someone's obedience on this Earth?:

Children are commanded to obey their parents:

Ephesians 6:1
6:1 Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right.  KJV

Colossians 3:20
20 Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord.  KJV

Servants are commanded to obey their masters:

Colossians 3:22
22 Servants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh; not with eyeservice, as menpleasers; but in singleness of heart, fearing God:  KJV

All are commanded to obey the government:

Titus 3:1
3:1 Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work,
KJV

Hebrews 13:17
17 Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that is unprofitable for you.  KJV

Did not Jesus even pay tribute (a form of tax levied on outsiders):

Matthew 17:24-27
24 And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute?
25 He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers?
26 Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free.
27 Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them, go thou to the sea , and cast an hook, and take up the fish that first cometh up; and when thou hast opened his mouth, thou shalt find a piece of money: that take, and give unto them for me and thee.  KJV

All are commanded to obey the Gospel:

1 Peter 4:17
17 For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?  KJV

And all are commanded to obey God:

Deuteronomy 13:4
4 Ye shall walk after the LORD your God , and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.  KJV

     So what is the problem with this term "obey"?  We all obey someone, from our parents, to our teachers, to our bosses, to our Police Officials—everybody obeys somebody.  I ask all disobedient, new-age, satan-overthrown, closet-Feminist women, who rebel against both God and man: isn't it that you actually have no problem with someone being in charge, but that you just want it to be you?  You don't want to follow a man, you want to be him; and want him to you.  Satan tells you to "spread your wings, take charge of your life," and satan has you to say in your heart "I am woman, hear me roar"; well, God has chosen differently—whom will you follow, satan, or your Lord God?  "Roaring" women in the Old Testament were usually returned to their father very shortly after the marriage.  Then  nobody wanted the spoiled goods.  There were very few (actually none) Feminist minded women in those days.  Back then having a husband meant that you ate on a regular basis, weren't raped all over the place, and weren't kidnapped into slavery or prostitution.  Today, satan has a civil overseer that does much of that protecting for you, so as that a man now is simply for bearing children—and even now they are being replaced in that.  Sperm banks, Genetic manipulation, single & Gay "parents", oh my! 

     And if you can't find a good Christian man to follow, then stay alone.  Did not the Scriptures advice as much: "The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord [i.e., only marry a Christian]." (1 Cor 7:39).  But if you weren't romping around with Heathen men all the time, maybe you would be available when you did finally meet a Christian man (they are almost impossible find themselves, I will admit).

     Question:  How come most women aren't man-less for more that a couple weeks (at best)?  Most often they go from man to man to man, without much of a break in-between, and they usually line up the replacement man before they dump the old one.  Why is that, ladies???  Like our friend here, the reader whose question we are answering: only a few weeks after he's kicked-out and his wife found another man!  (That would be clear evidence to me that my marriage is over!)  How can God send a good Christian man into your lives when you are always with some Heathen man or another, or bed-hopping to the point that anyone who has read the Bible wouldn't want you?  And also, most Christian men don't like their Christian women to have a sexual "track record" longer than the Great Wall of China.  But they have pretty much given up any hope of finding a virgin to marry.  That is to your shame, ladies!

     And for the "what-if-ers" in the crowd:  When any of these above principalities or people comes between you and God, obey God over them:

Acts 5:27-29
27 And when they had brought them, they set them before the council: and the high priest asked them,
28 Saying, Did not we straitly command you that ye should not teach in this name? and, behold, ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man's blood upon us.
29 Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.  KJV

     In closing, what is in store for you, Mr. Xxxxx?  Well, either way you have a loose end that you much tie up.  By civil law you are still married, and it would break civil law if you married again before you were divorced.  So my advice to you is to diligently seek that divorce, by the law, even though it may take years.

     Must you remain womanless until that divorce is final three years from now?  No, you are already divorced in God's eyes if she has committed Adultery and you wish to be loosed.  Had we done things God's way in this present world you would have been loosed from her the next day, and you would not be in this dilemma.  But you must follow civil law for conscience sake, and seek out that civil divorce.  And it would break civil law for you to be civilly married to another while you are civilly married to her.  "What if" she doesn't want the divorce?  She has no say in the matter:

Deuteronomy 24:1-2
24:1 When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house.
2 And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man's wife.  KJV

     Nevertheless, if she has not committed Adultery, then you are bound to try to convert her to the truth (though this whole "new boyfriend" thing is alarming!  If she isn't sleeping with him now, it's only a matter of time before she does).  Although, if she refuses to hear you, and forbids you by the power of the civil law (restraining order, etc.), then you are freed.  She broke the contract, and it is her alone that shall answer for the divorce on Judgement day.  You are free in that case.

     I am sorry that you are going through this; I too know the pain of an unfaithful woman (who doesn't anymore?).  Probably nothing hurts a man more than when his woman gives herself to another man (which is why God likens Idolatry to Adultery-He knows what hard-hearted, stubborn, and unfaithful humans, do not understand).  But a lesson in all of this for you, and it will take years before it is all behind you, is that you must find a Christian woman who is of sound doctrine BEFORE you go off marrying her and making babies.  You, being the man, must make your position perfectly clear as to the religion of the household—and if a woman doesn't accept that, then leave her alone, for, as you have found out, satan shall use her to destroy you.  There are many woman beautiful on the outside, but rotting on the inside—chose inner beauty and faithfulness, trust, obedience, and honor—over outer beauty and well-practiced sexiness, every time.

     Likewise, a Christian woman better be darn well be sure that her choice in a man is a good Christian.  If not, she is in for a miserable life of watching her husband lead her children into a dead Heathen belief system.

     You chose wisely, you Chose God, Christ, and truth of the Scriptures, over the love of a disobedient woman.  But many choose poorly, and like Adam of old, are overthrown by their wives.

Genesis 3:6
6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.  KJV

     So much for the woman wearing the pants in the family.  Adam should have told Eve to cease and desist.  But he did not; like so many "males" today, Adam didn't lead his woman, he rather followed HER lead.  You closed your letter with:

"I apologize if you do not answer these personal questions, I am just at a loss at what to do right now."

     I am one of the few with the guts and the confidence to answer those type of Questions Scripturally.  And for that, I have taken a beating, but never with sound doctrine.  The naysayers always bring their, "my Pastor says....", type objections to the table.  My question to them would be, "What if your Pastor is wrong?"  Is it not better, therefore, to document our answers (and objections) with the Holy Scriptures of God?  I never get mad at anyone who disagrees with me, in fact I welcome them to write in, but all I ask is that they support their disagreement with the Scriptures of God, not with their own opinions or prejudices.

Peace.

    For sensitive questions and answers regarding sex, marriage, etc., see our: Is sex within marriage only for having children? and Masturbation, does the Bible speak against it? and Sexuality, Marriage, and Pornography and "Suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man," was God just kidding?  Also: Feminism/Lesbianism/whoredom/abortion and Does the Bible prohibit birth control?

________________________________________________________________________
God bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ's name!
Nick Goggin

Back to list of questions at top of page

 
 

| Back To Top |

Most conspiracy sites are 30 percent accurate

 

A reader writes:

A couple questions. not necessarily to be public. I "study" with alexjones of prisonplanet.com just as I study with the Chapel [Pastor Murray]. You have said that "most conspiracy sites are 30 percent accurate". Do you feel the same way about him? I love the chapel but they appear to be necons and think Bush is a good guy. Do you think Pastor Murray, knows that george bush is a bohemian grove/skulls and bones satanic nazi. I havne't gotten this impression. It hurts to see have an issue of pride it seems to not have discernment on this. I could be wrong, so I figured I would ask you. It is nice to see someone who really know the truth. I have only met may four or five on the whole net. Not that we aren't also blind to many other things. don't mean to get cocky.

Answer:

 

Back to list of questions at top of page

 

| Back To Top |

"...As of June 2004 we are registering approx. 43,000 visits a year to our Website."

Back to list of questions at top of page

 

| Back To Top |

 

Perdition: The two beasts of Revelation 13 in relation to Revelation 20:10. And what of the "false prophet"?

 

A reader writes:

Dear Nick,
Great site!  I have a two part question about the two beasts of Revelation 13
in relation to Revelation 20:10.  It certainly makes sense that the two beasts
represent the NWO and satan, but I'm having a tough time reconciling this with
Revelation 20:10.

1)  In Revelation 20:10, the devil is cast into the lake of fire where the
beast and the false prophet ARE.  This makes a total of 'three' cast into the
lake of fire, instead of 'two'.  How can this be if the false prophet is
satan?

2)  If the first beast of Revelation 13 is an organization (such as the NWO),
how can a 'conceptual entity' be cast into the lake of fire?

I've been wrestling with this conundrum for a while.  Any light you can shed
on the subject would be much appreciated.  Your site is truly a blessing.
Xxxxxx

Another reader asks:

Hi Nick,
I've been studying your pages quite a bit, and some things bother me.
In the Emergence of the First Beast..........where does the false
prophet fit in?  I'm beginning to see where the 1st beast could be the
church/political system of that day.......but there still has to be a
false prophet.  Xxxxxxxxx

Answer: