Last updated Nov 18, 2008

| To Top |
Thanks to those who Donate to help the work!

.

“The jaws of power are always open to devour, and her arm is always stretched out, if possible, to destroy the freedom of thinking, speaking, and writing.” — John Adams 

Let us see then where the truth shall lead!

New Materials are below Introduction

Introduction

PLEASE READ; Notes:
1).  As always, in the Q&A's on this Website, when we write the word "you" in an answer, we are not necessarily meaning the person who asked the question; but rather, the reader, or to whom ever it may apply.  The answers here are written generally to "the reader," not necessarily to the person who asked the question.
2).  The use of the term "International Judaic" on this Website does not mean all those people who call themselves "Jews" today.  Most "Jews" of today are not International Judaics, nor are they even aware of the existence of such a body, having been purposely kept ignorant, and "managed" (handled) thru fear of pogrom.
3).  When speaking of people of races, religions, denominations, genders, lifestyles, etc., we NEVER here mean "all of them" unless we write the word "all."
4).  For issues regarding certain sensitive sourcing, see also our: Notes, disclaimers, apologia, etc.
5).  Watchmen Bible Study Group is not affiliated with any other ministries.  And we are not LDS (Mormon), nor are we Jehovah's Witness, we are Bible-based Christians; the word "Watchmen" in our title comes from (Ezek 33:2-6).
6).  This Website is neither "AntiSemitic," "Homophobic," "Racist," nor any other misdirected, overused, disingenuous, and subtly used pejorative; we are a Bible-believing Internet ministry which simply believed our Lord Jesus Christ when He said: "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32); and that there is never a good reason to suppress the truth, no matter how personally painful it may be to express it.

Traitor in office  The anti-American, Internationalist Socialist, NWO, Barack Obama (UPDATED Nov 18, 2008)

    A picture is indeed worth a thousand words:

    The above book title reads "The Post American World" (by the 28 year old Muslim, Fareed Zakaria).  Picture source.

    Amazon.com reviews the above book with the below words:

"...Zakaria describes with equal prescience a world in which the United States will no longer dominate the global economy, orchestrate geopolitics, or overwhelm cultures. He sees the 'rise of the rest'—the growth of countries like China, India, Brazil, Russia, and many others—as the great story of our time, and one that will reshape the world...." — Source.

    Nice reading material for the American President—the man responsible for the well being of the country into the future.  Barack Obama represents the sun-setting of America as we now know her, and the diluting and blending of her into a one-world-order, a New World Order where wealth and power distribution shall lower us into a second world nation and raise the third world to second world status.  That is Communism by way of Socialism (Liberalism).

    Well, America majority-voted President-Elect Obama into office, and for her sins she shall have him and all that he represents.  Today his tinkering is in regards to "Main Street verses Wall Street," tomorrow it shall be "the World verses America."  Today he will bail out "the middle class" (really the lower class) at the cost of the whole nation, tomorrow he shall bail out the whole world at the harm of all of America.  To put it plainly, Obama believes that it is "unfair" that America and Americans are doing so much better that the rest of the unachieving and uninspired world.  And he is going to do something about it—give from us to them.  Global Welfare underwritten on the backs of Americans and America.

How did it happen?

    They (Blacks and White Liberals) wanted a Black president so badly that they never stopped to analyze the content of Obama's character, merely being happy to judge the man by the color of his skin.  This, of course, is the direct reverse of Dr. Martin Luther King's edict to judge a man not by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character.  Thus proving themselves to be the real racists.

[Update Nov 18: For an eye-opener as to the state of mind of the voters who selected America's next president, see the following Zogby Poll and video of the alarming ignorance of Liberal Obama voters regarding the candidate's actual positions and the issues in the campaign: How Obama Got Elected... Interviews With Obama Voters.  By their sheer numbers, these grossly uninformed people gave America her next leader.  It is clear that Pres. Elect Obama wasn't chosen for his positions or policies; for, many of his supporters seem to have absolutely no idea what those positions and policies are.  Therefore it is obvious that in many cases Obama was selected for reasons other than what he would or would not do for this country.  That leaves his perceived race as a main issue for many of his voters.  Which, of course, is racist; so-called "reverse" racism, if you will.  See also the following article which explains what many sensed or knew but did not know how to define: Top psychiatrist concludes liberals are nuts!  Makes case ideology is mental disorder.  And being that over half the country are apparently so afflicted, this can have no good end, as Liberals and Leftists (closeted Socialists) traditionally are no friend of Christianity or of the freedom and respect for the individual Christian.  This brings to mind the words of Jesus Christ to His Christians, specially the endtime Christian:

John 15:18-23
18 If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.
19 If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.
20 Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also.
21 But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not him that sent me.
22 If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloke for their sin.
23 He that hateth me hateth my Father also. KJV]

    Once again, and this time forever, America has sacrificed on the altar of Political Correctness and has sworn by the gospel of Diversity.  Fools!  America, 232 years old, died on November 4th, 2008.  If you are a Christian and are not making preparations, then you are a very unwise Christian indeed.  Once again, this can have no good end.

~End~

(Posted Oct 30, 2008.)

   Can WBSG's warnings and alerts be misconstrued as "prophecy?"
 

Back in January, Jonah Goldberg wrote  in National Review Online that if Senator Barack Obama loses the presidential election

"I seriously think certain segments of American political life will become completely unhinged. I can imagine the fear of this social unraveling actually aiding Obama enormously in 2008."

We all know, of course, just which "segments of American political life" Goldberg is referring to so coyly. This "social unraveling" really means race riots.

In Salon.com, Glenn Greenwald immediately criticized Goldberg for making such an (allegedly) racist observation. And to my knowledge, Goldberg has not repeated it since. But it is an important question and Jonah Goldberg deserves credit for raising it, however gingerly.

In the same post, Goldberg further warned us that if Barack Obama loses the presidential election "teeth shall be gnashed, clothes rent, and prices paid".

I am not really sure what Goldberg meant by this. But I certainly agree that the outcome might very well be dangerous—most especially, for whites.

How dangerous? Consider one of the more serious race riots of the last decade: the Cincinnati Riots of 2001.

In April, 2001, 19-year old Timothy Thomas led a dozen police officers on a long, late-night chase through the dangerous "Over-the-Rhine" section of Cincinnati. One officer eventually intercepted Thomas, suddenly confronting him face to face in an alley. Thomas then apparently tried to pull up his sagging pants. The officer believed he was reaching for a weapon. He fired once, killing Thomas, who turned out to be unarmed.

Timothy Thomas was the 15^th black male to die while in confrontation with the Cincinnati police in six years. Soon Cincinnati’s black leaders began to repeat the cry of "15 Black Men" over and over again—a cry that was quickly picked up and parroted by a compliant media.

This, despite the fact that most of these black men were extremely violent criminals—one murdered a teenage girl with an axe and another shot a female police officer, then carjacked her cruiser. In fact, ten of the Cincinnati 15 had pointed or fired guns at police officers during their fatal attempts to resist arrest. Two others tried to run over officers with their cars.

These facts did not matter to Cincinnati’s black leaders, some of whom had already filed a racial-profiling lawsuit against the city’s police department. Norma Holt Davis of the NAACP announced that Thomas’s death was just more proof that "the police force has declared war on African-Americans."

Two days after Thomas’s death, a heated throng of black activists forced their way into a City Council meeting with the usual demands for "justice". The protest quickly grew into a crowd of over 1,000 black men, women, and even children. They eventually poured out of Cincinnati City Hall, then marched down to police headquarters, shouting angry demands to meet with the Chief of Police. Some even took pictures of the officers guarding the entrance to the police station, taunting them with promises of future retribution. [What Really Happened in Cincinnati, By Heather Mac Donald, City Journal, Summer 2001]

Anger would only increase over the next three days. hordes of black males rampaged through the city targeting whites and white-owned establishments. Storefront windows were smashed in and their goods looted, parked cars were trashed, vending machines were overturned. Rioters also torched an outdoor market, a police substation and dragged several dumpsters into the middle of the street and set them ablaze.

"It was a night of white terror" said one Cincinnati business owner. Blacks heaved bricks through the windows of passing white motorists, and pulled white men and women from their vehicles and pummeled them. Some indiscriminately fired gunshots into the air, and very often, at white police officers.

Unfortunately, such instances of mass racial violence are not unusual. Many Americans do not realize how often they occur because the MainStream Media either glosses over such events or ignores them altogether. CNN, for example, initially described the Cincinnati Riots as mere "disturbances" committed by "protesters".  

       Most people outside of New York have never heard of the Crown Heights Riots of 1991, where for three days black mobs looted stores, vandalized property, and brutalized whites, specifically Jews—culminating in the death of 29 year old Yankel Rosenbaum, who suffered multiple stab wounds and a crushed skull.
 

       Few Americans remember the Seattle Mardi Gras Riots of 2001, where gangs of young black men (and women) clobbered whites at random, including twenty year old Kristopher Kime who was hit over the head with a broken bottle then stomped to death for coming to the aid of a badly beaten white woman.

Given this proclivity to mass racial violence, it seems reasonable to ask, then, if riots will break out around Election Day—not simply because Barack Obama is the nominee, but because so many members of the black underclass fervently support him.

Rapper Snoop Dog recently told Newsweek: "People that I know that have never cared about politics are registering to vote this time: gang members, ex-cons, you name it. I hate to see a lot of that hope go down the drain, and if [Obama] loses, it will."

In a recent column well-worth reading, Dennis Prager warned that "the deep emotional connection that nearly every black American has to an Obama victory is difficult for even empathetic non-blacks to measure". [Liberals' Warnings About Obama Loss May Prove Self-Fulfilling, September 23, 2008]

Yes, white liberals are attached to Obama too, but only superficially. After Election Day, they can sip their lattes with a clean conscience knowing that they voted for a black man for President, then go on with life as usual.

For black Americans, however, Barack Obama is far more than a cause célèbre. Their attachment, as Prager suggests, is something far deeper, and far more disturbing.

This emotional connection is perhaps best illustrated in a video taken at a charter school in Kansas City, Missouri and posted on Youtube [link]. In the video, about a dozen black teenagers dressed in military fatigues parade and chant about how Barack Obama has inspired them to be the next architect, doctor and so on.

It is clear from the stony stares of these boys that Obama does not so much inspire their admiration as reinforce their anger. How do you expect they will react if Obama loses the election?

White liberals have convinced themselves that Barack Obama is one of them, or nearly so, because of his articulate English and elite education. What would an Ivy League educated, half-white man from Hawaii have in common with incendiary black leaders like Louis Farrakhan?

Quite a bit, actually. Obama’s spiritual mentor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, is a good friend of Louis Farrakhan and even accompanied him to Libya to meet with General Muammar Gaddaffi in 1984. And in 1995, Barack Obama himself flew from Chicago to Washington, D.C. to attend Farrakhan’s Million Man March. He described the march then as "a powerful demonstration of an impulse and need for African-American men to come together to recognize each other and affirm our rightful place in the society".

The unsettling truth is that Barack Obama is not some bridge between black and white, but a man who is obsessed with the perceived injustice of growing up black in a white-run world. In Dreams from My Father, Obama writes of how, as a teenager, he would closet himself in his room and absorb the works of black radicals like W.E.B. DuBois and Malcolm X, withdrawing "into a smaller and smaller coil of rage".

Indeed, the one idea Obama most identified with then was Malcolm X’s wish that "the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged".

It does not seem to matter to Barack Obama that the white blood that runs through him is not there by an act of violence, but by an act of marriage. Or that he has never personally experienced any of the injustices we typically associate with black Americans.

Clearly, Barack Obama has far more in common with the angry young black men who are devoted to his candidacy than most Americans realize.

Moreover, Obama has been leading in the polls for many weeks. His supporters are psychologically prepared for his victory. So if he is ultimately defeated, then it would appear to be because a significant number of white voters switched to John McCain at the last minute. When that happens, expect the pundit class to make many gloating remarks about the "Bradley Effect" and how bigoted American voters will just never elect a black candidate.

Even Obama supporters have begun to admit violence is likely if Obama loses. On CNN, James Carville recently hinted at riots, saying that if Obama loses, "it would be very, very dramatic out there".

And Philadelphia Daily News columnist Fatima Ali, a fervent Obama supporter, recently wrote that "If McCain wins, look for a full-fledged race and class war, fueled by a deflated and depressed country, soaring crime, homelessness—and hopelessness." [We need Obama, not 4 more years of George Bush, September 2, 2008]

Many urban police departments are making special preparations in the event of Election Day unrest, including Cincinnati, Chicago, Philadelphia and Detroit. The Oakland Police Department has announced that they will deploy riot control units on November 4^th and have a SWAT team on standby. [Police prepare for unrest, TheHill.com, By Alexander Bolton, October 21, 2008]

Significantly, police fear violence not only if Barack Obama loses—but even if he wins. That is because blacks have a history of violence in victory, especially after sporting events. For example, riots of varying size often coincide with the conclusion of the NBA Finals, most notably in Detroit after the Pistons won the 1990 title. Seven people died during the "celebrations".

Some will call it bigoted to prepare ourselves for post-election race riots. But given recent history, it’s all too possible that if Barack Obama loses the presidential election, a large number of black Americans just might become unhinged.

If this is bigotry, make the most of it.

~End~

Signs of the times:  Mainstream media, Congressmen, and the elite, openly speaking about the upcoming Martial Law in the U.S. (Posted Oct 19, 2008)

    Below is a disturbing interview carried on CNN on October 13, 2008, between media personality Glen Beck and author Peter Schiff on CNN.

    You might remember the Schiff name; the Shiffs were Rothschild agents and the holders of the commission of one of original twelve Federal Reserve Banks at the "Fed's" inception in 1913.  Jacob Shiff was also present at the secret Jekyll Island meeting (off the Georgian coast, USA, 1907-1910) where the privately-owned "Fed" was born (the Federal Reserve Act of 1913).  In other words, they are NWO insiders, or International Judaics, if you will.  See the seminal work: SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE ; The London Connection, by Eustace Mullins (E-book), where we read among other things:

“JACOB HENRY SCHIFF (1847-1920)[:]  Born in Rothschild house in Frankfurt, Germany. Emigrated to United States, married Therese Loeb, daughter of Solomon Loeb, founder of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. Schiff became senior partner of Kuhn, Loeb and Co., and as representative of Rothschild interests gained control of most of railway mileage in United States.” (Pg. 189); and:

“Q: Who owns the stock of the Federal Reserve Banks?  A: The dynastic families of the ruling World Order, internationalists who are loyal to no race, religion, or nation. They are families such as the Rothschilds, the Warburgs, the Schiffs, the Rockefellers, the Harrimans, the Morgans and others known as the elite, or "the big rich".” (Pg. 202).

    By the way, all the aforementioned men, the "internationalists," "elite," and "big rich" as they are called above in the page #202 quote, are Judaics and crypto-Jews (the Rockefellers are cryptos, the others open).  By design, the Morgans bought up the twenty most influential newspapers in the USA and by that scheme took over American media, lock, stock, and barrel.  Rockefeller founded Standard Oil and national and international banking houses (also the CFR and the Trilateral Commission).  They also were the creators of what they call the "China experiment" (Chinese Communism).  The Warburgs and Harrimans made it big in railroads and banking (national and international).  The Rothschilds own the world, quite literally; and they also orchestrated and financed the creation of the nation of "Israel" in 1948.  The Shiffs also heavily financed (to the tune of $20 Mil.) the Judaic takeover of Russia in their 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, creating the Atheist Communist U.S.S.R. out of the once Christian Kingdom of Russia.  Seeing a pattern here?

    Anyway, at about 4:30 Min. into the below video they will openly talk about Martial Law in America, something which we have been writing about here at WBSG for ten years, and for which we have been ridiculed by the 'trusters,' the can't-beleive-it'ers, and the simple.  So we see a convergence of thought between the "conspiracy theorists" and the powerful elite and insiders.

    Talk of Martial Law in America can no longer be relegated to the "tin-foil-hat wearing conspiracy theorist" garbage pile.  The question is, have you prepared for it?  It is coming—when, we cannot say—but it is coming.  The word "soon" is coming to mind; and as we see in the below newscast we are not alone in that opinion.

Video 9:39 Min. long

~End~
 

Massive secret race-transfer scheme: The International Judaics moving into the final phase of the destruction of the true-Israel people of Europe (Posted Oct 14, 2008)

    The European Union (EU) is working on a secret plan to inject 50 million Africans into the 27 European states of the EU.  And the rotating head of the Council of the European Union, French President and crypto-Jew Nicolas Sarkozy, is pushing to get it implemented before his term expires at the end of this year.  At current population levels, injecting  50,000,000 African immigrants into the European Union's 491,018,683 people (July 2008 est.) amounts to just over a 10% "re-culturing."  And with traditional Europeans not even maintaining a 2.1 birthrate per woman which is required to keep a population even at static (current) levels (the European Union nations have 1.5 children born per woman [2008 est.]—a 25% deficit), and African's traditional 3-5+ births per female, the seeds are sown for a complete transfer of the racial (and religious) makeup of Europe in a very short time, two generations even.

    Through their Abortion agenda and their social movement of creating liberated women "too important and busy" to have children, the International Judaics are succeeding in reducing Europe's traditional White Christian population down to non-sustainable levels (more die than are born).  Now they are moving into the final phase by replacing these White Christians with Black Muslims.  Or otherwise stated, replacing true Israelites with Gentiles; and all the while with false "Jews" claiming to be true Israel, as they do.  That is what is going on here in the world.

    And once completed, the International Judaic's most hated enemy, the TRUE-Israel people—that is to say the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian and kindred peoples—will become a distant memory.  The Christian church falling away with them, as planned as long ago as 1884 and beyond.  The Judaic's Protocols from circa 1884, states:

“WE ["Jews"] HAVE LONG PAST TAKEN CARE TO DISCREDIT THE PRIESTHOOD OF THE "GOYIM," [human cattle; i.e., non-Jews] and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE [liberalism, humanism, atheism] HAS BEEN DECLARED EVERYWHERE, SO THAT NOW ONLY YEARS DIVIDE US FROM THE MOMENT OF THE COMPLETE WRECKING OF THAT CHRISTIAN RELIGION: as to other religions we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them, but it would be premature to speak of this now. We shall set clericalism and clericals [religion] into such narrow frames as to make their influence move in retrogressive proportion to its former progress.”

— The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol № 17, ¶ 2.  Probably written in 1884, but published in 1901 (The Protocols of…Zion were also delivered as the minutes of the First Zionist Congress held at Basle, Switzerland, in 1897, under the presidency of the "father of Modern Zionism," the late Theodore Herzl.) A copy of the Protocols of…Zion is in the British Museum today bearing the date of its reception, August 10, 1906.  One on-line source: http://www.biblestudysite.com/plez.htm